Email from a non-SadGeezer
I was joking Sad – clearly I’m more adept at getting my point across when I’m not joking. I note it is customary to have a spoiler alert on certain postings to warn people in advance about its content. Perhaps my jokes should begin with the warning Spoil Sport Alert. Either way, I’m sorry for antagonising you. And I’m not back – really. just thought Jen should be defended against the suggestion that she might have been me.
Incidentally, I tend to agree with Lee about Norb. When I watch the (fantastic) opening scene, I’m convinced the ‘playground in space’ theme (park) is intended as a lure and is, in effect, an eloborate disguise. The claim that it is not consistent with the drone’s behaviour doesn’t quite make sense in the Lexx universe: continuity is hardly an issue in Lexx. looks like Donovan just wanted to spend the money obviously allocated to this episode. As for his suggestion that Garden is not rife with sexual imagery and merely a projection of the male libidonal drive – pleaaaseee!! I watched this episode with my girlfriend, her mother and her mother’s mother – and watching them look at each other in continual shock was almost as fun as watching them squirm at Downey’s erection in another episode. The imagery is so overt as to beggar belief.
Spoil Sport Alert 1.
Btw, that IS pretty much how I met my wife. [img]images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]
Spoil Sport Alert 2.
I am struck, however, by your suggestion that Jen Fridy could really be Brian Downey. [img]images/smiles/icon_razz.gif[/img]
[ 15-03-2002: Message edited by: bonnee ]