PLEASE!!…bigger pic’s!
- This topic has 9 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
um,guy’s…would it be possible to get some decent sized pic’s of TTR,especially six??..are you taking the pic’s right off the tube or what?..now i don’t want to ruffle anyone’s feathers,and i know the bigger the pic the more bandwith you use..but at least make them a little bigger for us!…thank’s!
Yes and No. I can make the images as large as you want them. But quality is sacrificed. I’m am recording the images through the computer, and I can only get it as clean as my signal. My computer assumes/readies the video for a certain size. If I try to increase it, it starts to get fuzzy.
I’d much rather have a good medium sized picture then a large grainy one. Besides, the screencaps are intended for the guides, where a large picture is an obstruction.
But then again it’s all relative. If you think this is an okay image:
[img]http://www.scifi.com/tripping/episodes/season1/06_recalled/images/episode6_3big.jpg[/img] then I can do plenty of those without a problem.I’m not too concerned about bandwidth. A full screen sized picture wouldn’t be too much larger then what I already use.
hey headge…thanks for the reply!..and an excellent sixed pic of xp by the way!..now,can you do that for the rest of the pic’s in the download section? 🙄 ..if not,can you blow up certain one’s? 🙂 thank’s! 😉
Bandwidth is a little dodgy at the moment, but hey, if Headge wants to take the time and trouble to scan the pics as good as the one above, then I can surely find the money for some extra bandwidth! Roll on the piccies 🙂
[quote=”bouyantman”]hey headge…thanks for the reply!..and an excellent sixed pic of xp by the way!..now,can you do that for the rest of the pic’s in the download section? 🙄 ..if not,can you blow up certain one’s? 🙂 thank’s! :wink:[/quote]
I stole that picture from scifi.com/tripping. But the quality is the same as what I would get from doing a screengrab direct from the tv-in.
It will be a near impossibilty to go back and redo all ~200 screengrabs. Firstly because to get the aformentioned quality, I’d have to have it come in on my tv-card. Since scifi isn’t reruning those episodes yet, I can’t do it. Finally I just don’t have the time to redo everything. Each screengrab takes about 30-60 sec to do, including the time it takes to upload and categorize each picture. I don’t have that kind of time.
I will just be sure to do pics like that in the future.
[quote=”SadGeezer”]Bandwidth is a little dodgy at the moment, but hey, if Headge wants to take the time and trouble to scan the pics as good as the one above, then I can surely find the money for some extra bandwidth! Roll on the piccies[/quote]
I checked it’s not that much more in terms of size. The pics would go from about 10k-15k to 25k-30k. Even less if I do a few tricks. it’s not like I’d be putting up 150k monsters.
Most of the downloads bandwidth goes to the thumbnails for the galleries. The thumbs are roughly equal sized no matter what the source file is, so I believe that the overall affect on bandwidth will be minimal.I could just say that I’d only do high quality stuff for Six realted or more popular images. But that would really be the same as doing the above. The average Six pic has several thousand hits. Whip is in the mid thirties…
[quote=”Headgehog”][quote=”bouyantman”]hey headge…thanks for the reply!..and an excellent sixed pic of xp by the way!..now,can you do that for the rest of the pic’s in the download section? 🙄 ..if not,can you blow up certain one’s? 🙂 thank’s! :wink:[/quote]
I stole that picture from scifi.com/tripping. But the quality is the same as what I would get from doing a screengrab direct from the tv-in.
It will be a near impossibilty to go back and redo all ~200 screengrabs. Firstly because to get the aformentioned quality, I’d have to have it come in on my tv-card. Since scifi isn’t reruning those episodes yet, I can’t do it. Finally I just don’t have the time to redo everything. Each screengrab takes about 30-60 sec to do, including the time it takes to upload and categorize each picture. I don’t have that kind of time.
I will just be sure to do pics like that in the future.
[quote=”SadGeezer”]Bandwidth is a little dodgy at the moment, but hey, if Headge wants to take the time and trouble to scan the pics as good as the one above, then I can surely find the money for some extra bandwidth! Roll on the piccies[/quote]
I checked it’s not that much more in terms of size. The pics would go from about 10k-15k to 25k-30k. Even less if I do a few tricks. it’s not like I’d be putting up 150k monsters.
Most of the downloads bandwidth goes to the thumbnails for the galleries. The thumbs are roughly equal sized no matter what the source file is, so I believe that the overall affect on bandwidth will be minimal.I could just say that I’d only do high quality stuff for Six realted or more popular images. But that would really be the same as doing the above. The average Six pic has several thousand hits. Whip is in the mid thirties…[/quote]
hey hedge!..thanks for taking the time to reply!..and ANYTHING you can do with the stuff for six would be appreciated!(i was hoping for something like that! 😀 ) i understand you really can’t do anything about all her older stuff(dam! 🙁 )but any of the newer stuff that you can make bigger would be great!! 😀 ….i mean,who want’s to see small six when you can see the big one’s…..um,i mean bigger one’s…..um,yea, you know what i mean! 😆
[img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/html/modules/My_eGallery/gallery/TTR/Six/107ak.jpg[/img]
And many other can be found throughout the TTR downloads section. Most of the new stuff is in either the [url=http://www.sadgeezer.com/html/index.php?module=My_eGallery&do=showgall&gid=126&p=]2001 Space Idiocies [/url]section or the [url=http://www.sadgeezer.com/html/index.php?module=My_eGallery&do=showgall&gid=103&p=]Six section[/url].
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.