Modurator’s report…Big Angry Rant!!!

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Aleck:
[QB]Okay. Firstly, if you’re going to criticize other people’s writing, it’s generally a good idea to at least make the effort to spell things correctly. I know, I know, this is just a message board and not a school paper, but sloppiness bugs me (no pun intended).

Ohh…ok, what word(s) is it that you would like me to write a hundred times over on the chalk board then Miss? In Shakespeare’s time, the English language was written phonetically anyway. [img]images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img] Great tradition, it should continue.

Well, considering how this is the first negative thing I’ve read about the report (and that the main criticism comes from the fact that some people said “bad things” about McManus [img]images/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img] ), I think that most people have been pretty pleased with it. And, considering that it’s been stated that this is not supposed to be a “last word” on what went down during the time there, and that any questions about the events would be answered, I think that criticizing the work for what it *doesn’t* say is an invalid criticism. If there’s something you wanted to know, but wasn’t addressed in the piece, why not just *ask*? I mean, the authors post here all the time, it’s not like they’re inaccessible.

No it isn’t…It’s a VERY valid critism. I have chatted with one of the authors on this already BTW…and that author hadn’t realised that the MM bashing was so prevalent. And, I hope the authors would be kind enough to answer the questions raised by my post here. Which reminds me…I have a couple of other bits to answer here…so ‘scuse me a min while I fly to….