Dawn!
quote:
Originally posted by Squishy:
Like I keep saying get the Eva posts, becuase my recollection is somewhat different to your’s.
They, along with many of the older threads on this board, seem to have disappeared in one of the many crashes. I can’t search by your member number, as you’ve registered and re-registered and have gotten new membership numbers. I can’t use *mine* to search because my membership information was wiped out in one of the crashes. But it *did* happen, and if you don’t remember it (or at least claim not to) then I can’t back it up.
quote[quote]And like I will bite to certain things, but unlike you I don’t drag it out because I don’t have anything better to do,[/quote]
Again, you go into insult mode, and make idiotic assumptions about me.
quote[quote]you’re posts are consistently long and always contain the same ‘let me look something up in the past I bash you over the head with’, you should have been a lawyer.[/quote]
Yes, Squish, you’re right. I do that in *every* post I make. [img]images/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img]
quote[quote]You are trying to find something bad on me simply because you recognise the fact that I am correct in my description of you.[/quote]
No, it’s because you’re guilty of exactly what you claim of me, and you’re too damned pig-headed to realize it.
quote[quote]Go ahead and dig the dirt, it doesn’t change the type of person you are, nothing will change that Aleck.[/quote]
So, you’re saying that by me “digging the dirt” that I’m trying to change the type of person I am? Huh??? *laughs* That’s priceless!!! No, Squish, I’m not looking to change who I am.
quote[quote]As for the ideas that are put forward, concerning Lexx and the cycles of time, well lest you forget I was not the only one to think that, however I never once did claim that it was in fact or a legitimate end to the story…so please get your facts straight before you start throwing accusations.[/quote]
No, you weren’t the only one. But that didn’t make it any more valid (unless a lot of people saying the same stupid thing actually makes something more valid). And you may not have claimed that it was a legitimate end, but you sure got your drawers in a bunch when I tried to say that it didn’t make sense for it to happen. But then, I can’t express my theories or opinions if they don’t mesh with yours, right? *Then* they turn into “rants” and aren’t valid any more. *chuckles*
quote[quote]Also as far as the Buffy series goes, you have no more insight to this series than anyone else, so you are in no position to dismiss anything, you’re facts do not hold water and the series is open to intepretation, but as you can’t even agree to that I take anything you say as rubbish.[/quote]
No, I’m not going to agree that my theories don’t hold water. Why would I do that? You certainly wouldn’t. If you went around saying that Buffy was actually a 98-year-old male retired nuclear scientist instead of a college-aged girl, you wouldn’t admit that it didn’t hold water. I agree that the series is open to interpretation, and I’ve said that it is *possible* though *very unlikely* that Dawn would become the Slayer. You, on the other hand, won’t agree that any other interpretation exists other than your own, and anything else is someone “not wanting to accept anyone else’s opinion.”
quote[quote]Whedon has pulled off some minor miracles in the story to pull off the impossible, so the idea of Dawn being a slayer is something that you cannot rule out, no matter how arrogant you are.[/quote]
Which is an odd statement to make, since you yourself essentially ruled out that Dawn would become the Slayer on your own. And arrogance doesn’t enter into it. Logically looking at the evidence does, though, which is something that appears to be beyond your comprehension.
quote[quote]You are a sad person Aleck[/quote]
Again with the insults. [img]images/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img]
quote[quote]Like I said before DT never understood why people responded strongly to his posts and you being the same type of persona have no understanding either.[/quote]
No, I understand completely. You don’t like the idea that I don’t agree with you, and Bonnee doesn’t like the idea that I disagree with anyone. Hence your strong reactions.
quote[quote]As for getting personal, well that is your assumption, I do not know you well enough, and my views on you are no less valid than those you used against DT…so I find that a hypocritical statement for you to make.[/quote]
Which statements are you talking about? If you’re talking about having problems in a social setting, DT himself admitted that. It’s not my assumption that you’re getting personal. You make statements about me, that’s personal. That’s not an assumption. That’s your action.
quote[quote]I’m not going to respond to your next post as it’s obvious that’s precisely what you are hoping for given you’re past record with DT and Bonnee.[/quote]
You mean you’re finally going to shut up? Oh, thank god.
quote[quote]But I hold you in as much disdain as Bonnee does, and as I now realise you’re not somebody I choose to be on friendly terms with on this board, if I should see another one of you’re pigheaded self-loving posts, I shall respond just as Bonnee does, from me you shall receive the same detrimental treatment you awarded to DT.[/quote]
Ditto. Welcome to the club.
quote[quote]Now go away and stop thinking of yourself all the time and look at the flip side for a change…although I thoroughly doubt that’s possible.[/quote]
Infinitely more possible than it is for you, apparantly.
–Aleck