Posted 1st January 1970
Email from a non-SadGeezer
quote:
Originally posted by DalekTek790:
On that note, which estrogen-charged female on Sad’s staff is responsible for the notion (implied int he review for Garden) that the watering cans were intended as phallic symbols?
I don’t think that it’s neccessarily a female thing that caused that conclusion to be drawn. I think it’s pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain that they were intended as phallic symbols. It doesn’t take a couple of X chromosomes to pick up on that one.
–Aleck