Lomea is BACK!

quote:

---

Originally posted by DalekTek790:
[b]Ick! That was one of the worst scenes in [i]Lexx[/i]. I don’t see why anyone would want her back. [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/frown.gif[/img]

[/b]

---

Darlek!

Wot are you on dude! For a geezer who likes cool TV Sci Fi (and films), you never seem to appreciate the full social spleandour of the best bits.

Now you just HAVE to agree that the scream in that scene was just amazingly scary, stomach turning and erotic…..

go on…

admit it! [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/biggrin.gif[/img]

——————
[img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/sad-images/sad-sig.gif[/img]

I didn’t see anything wrong with that scene. It was a classic lexx sex confusion. Lyekka was making references to killing and eating Lomea while Lomea thought Lyekka was talking about sex.
If you have a problem with that, does that mean you also have a problem with scenes from 791, Girltown, Love Grows, etc, etc?

——————
“Prick your finger it is done. The moon has now eclipsed the sun. The angel has spread it’s wings, the time has come for better things…”

hey guys, i have been offline lately because my isp is so damn slow and my feverish efforts to find dsl have come to naught (IN NYC!) at least naught that i can afford…i found lomia alternately entertaining and annoying as she was meant to be, but i did enjoy the double-entendre and people talking about two different things while we the audience know what is really happening…dalek tek this is a common device throughout literature ( and science fiction) and i remain perplexed as to why you persist in being so judgmental in your posts, and your prudishness regarding sexual matters smacks of falwellism…everyone can share opinions here in a manner that does not make others feel attacked for their values, (or lack thereof by your views it would appear,) so ease up [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/wink.gif[/img] i like hearing from you, i just don’t like feeling as though i should be wearing a big scarlet A on my chest! anyway i just hope they do not bring back lomia’s parents, they were really annoying, especially dad’s combover do (how do the beans find such amazingly tacky people or at least actors who do tacky so well!)

Holy cow! Lomi the Dominatrix, what a deal! I gotta say, the more I hear about little season 4 snippets, the greater my curiousity! I thought she was hysterical in Twilight. As to her parents, I hate to admit it, but I found them rather endearing in an annoying way. Truth be told, I actually used to know a couple very much like them. EEeekk

I like [i]Lexx[/i], it’s a good show. But, like all shows, it has its shortcomings, and sometimes it is downright repulsive. [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/frown.gif[/img]

We’re here to discuss [i]Lexx[/i]. We like to stick to the good things, but we can’t pretend that the bad things don’t exist.

I post my opinions, and usually there are people here who agree and people wo disagree. But sometimes everyone inexplicably disagrees and it turns into an argument. And then people twist what I say and make me sound like some sort of weird pervert. [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/mad.gif[/img]

It’s not just me. All of my friends seem to agree on what I said under “Thoughts on the next season…Anyone?” And I doubt I’m the only Lexxian here who changed the channel when Lyekka and Lomea got a little too close. [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/confused.gif[/img]

And as for Jerry Falwell, not, I didn’t know who he was when I posted that. Now that NB1 put down his full name, I typed it into a search engine and figured out who he was. I have nothing against the man, but I don’t see how I in any way resemble him. I’ve never mentioned religion (except to counter religious arguments someone else started). You don’t even know what religion I am! [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/rolleyes.gif[/img]

——————
Lee P. Sherman, code name DalekTek790
Whovian, Froudian, Lexxian, etc.

quote:

---

Originally posted by DalekTek790:
I like [i]Lexx[/i], it’s a good show. But, like all shows, it has its shortcomings, and sometimes it is downright repulsive. [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/frown.gif[/img]

We’re here to discuss [i]Lexx[/i].

[b]exactly, and discussion usually involves using common references and a gentle exchange of ideas preferably delivered in a nonjudgmental fashion otherwise it becomes a shouting match or argument , a la middle east peace talks [/b]

I post my opinions, and usually there are people here who agree and people wo disagree. But sometimes everyone inexplicably disagrees and it turns into an argument.

[b]that would be because you do not follow the nonjudgmental clause (see above) [/b]
And I doubt I’m the only Lexxian here who changed the channel when Lyekka and Lomea got a little too close. [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/confused.gif[/img]

[b]perhaps not, but you are conspicuous by being the one who posts in a sometimes very nettling fashion [/b]

And as for Jerry Falwell, not, I didn’t know who he was when I posted that. I have nothing against the man, but I don’t see how I in any way resemble him. I’ve never mentioned religion (except to counter religious arguments someone else started). You don’t even know what religion I am! [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/rolleyes.gif[/img]

[b]thus your knowledge base has depth but not breadth…jerry falwell is the spokesman for the so-called moral majority, the same man who opined that aids is god’s judgment on homosexuality, so the fact that you have nothing against the man indicates that you either unfamiliar with some of his hate doctrine or that you agree with it, and if i sound judgmental here, i assure you it is entirely intentional [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/smile.gif[/img]…and let me reiterate that if you are perplexed by peoples’ reactions to your posts it is because you are not understanding their responses, you have been repeatedly asked to quit using the (royal) we…as for the religious nature of your remarks, the particulars of which protestant sect you adhere to are irrelevant, it is the nature of your priggishness and willingness to censor the behavior,talk and views of others which marks you as the follower of such repressive religious viewpoints[/b]

---

[This message has been edited by FX (edited March 25, 2001).]

quote:

---

Originally posted by DalekTek790:
[b]Since the concept of collective representation is apparently too complex for some of the people here to grasp, I’ll explain why I say “we” in some of my posts. That is done when I (or anyone else) speak for the entire board and its members, not just for myself. But then people go and disagree with me. [img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/ubb/frown.gif[/img][/b]

---

Okay, even though I am of the opinion that you’re posting just for the reason that you claimed FX posts for, and that you are actually merely one of the troika of Deuce’s personalities, I’ll bite once again (if, for no other reason, than to discourage others to speak for the group as a whole here, if not also for the undeniable fact that I enjoy a good argument)…
Who asked you to speak for the board and its members? You’re not a moderator or official of this board (unless you actually are, and are speaking under an assumed moniker), and even if you *were* it would be presumptious and ill-advised for you to speak for anyone besides yourself, unless you have polled the members of the board individually and they all came to an unamimous decision.
You don’t speak for me, you never asked to speak for me, and even if you did ask to do so, I doubt I would give permission, as I would much rather express my own opinions, thankyouverymuch.
Using the “we” in this sense, when I disagree with your points, is offensive to me personally, and if you continue to use it, I will continue to argue the point.

End of story.

–Aleck

The Dalek dude has been a valued poster on this board for a while, we often dissagree, and I sometimes wonder why he visits so often since I’m obviously into the more artistic (ok, ok, T&A) aspects of LEXX than DalekTek790.

But it’s ok?! There are peeps on this board who can make even me blush 🙂

What I find interesting and absolutely marvelous is the fact that we can have such a conversation about a sci fi show. For such a long time sci fi has been sanitised and censored. We couldn’t have this discussion about any other sci fi show reviewed on this site (with the possible exception of Aeon Flux).

——————
[img]http://www.sadgeezer.com/sad-images/sad-sig.gif[/img]

Although ‘Twilight’ is one of my fave episodes, I don’t think that just because Lomea wears black lipstick – she should be (ahem) categorized as a ‘goth’.

Just my two cents.

Yes, Lomea! There is another little tidbit floating around out there. Kai will meet a lady assassin. No word on if she is a contemporary assassin, like Nikita, or a Brunnen one. What will he do? Will she get a rise out of his cod or get skewered by his brace?

FX you crack me up! Speaking of rises, have you done a frame by frame on the Mantrid scene? You can just catch MM doing the instant sit up cod grab. And what is is? Heh,Heh.

Speaking of [i]Twilight[/i], does anyone know who wrote [i]The Wheel[/i] (the poem that Kai recites)? Was it Lex Gigeroff, Paul Donovan…Michael McManus? Does it say in the credits? Is it some famous poem I’ve just never heard of?

[i]The wheel, it turns, it comes around,
It makes an ancient rolling sound.

The billowing clouds that puff and flower,
They’re calling me to an ancient bauer.

Where no thing is shall nothing be,
Only then will I be free.

Gather ’round the wheel, my friends,
And make amends, and make amends,
For all this is about to end.

The fickle fates, the cosmic grind,
Conspire to leave our friends behind.

The night doth bleed into morn,
Sunlight seeping through the dawn.

Fellows, come. Share with me your tired days,
And let my windy words fill your empty sails,
As you travel ‘cross grey hills and brownish dales.[/i]

——————
Lee P. Sherman, code name DalekTek790
Whovian, Froudian, Lexxian, etc.